Subject Dossier — Sancœur, Nathalie

CONFIDENTIAL // LEVEL IV

SUBJECT DOSSIER: SANCŒUR, NATHALIE

FILE ID: C-AE/NS-006 • ORG: CONSULTATIVE ASSEMBLY OF EDEN • CUSTODIAN: DIR. DOMINIC

I. IDENTIFIERS

Aliases: “Nat”, “Sancœur”, “Natasha” (historical)

Origin: Lille (FR) / Family emigration from USSR (Serdtseva → Sancœur)

Role: Field Operative; Retrieval & Penetration Specialist; Later: Executive Assistant (Agreste)

Competencies: Covert entry, cryptography, garment engineering, seam integrity (surgical grade), linguistic code-switching, controlled affect, martial arts, use of weaponry, high-pressure logistics.

Subject Photo — Nathalie Sancœur
SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPH — LATEST AVAILABLE

II. EXECUTIVE SYNOPSIS

Asset is a high-value, high-risk operative defined by pathological loyalty and self-erasure. Demonstrates exceptional technical and analytical prowess, particularly in textile engineering and covert penetration. Primary utility is as a force multiplier and stability anchor for high-dysfunction assets (see: AGRESTE, G.). Core vulnerability is a monomaniacal drive to preserve a self-defined "family unit," which overrides all self-preservation instincts. Requires active management to prevent operational degradation via starvation logic, sleep denial, and unilateral martyrdom. A precision instrument; handle with calibrated empathy and firm control protocols.

III. BACKGROUND

IV. OPERATIONAL HISTORY

Operational Codename: THE SPECTOR

Mission Profile: Excels in long-term penetration, asset retrieval, and logistical overwatch. Noted for flawless execution in high-stress environments and ability to maintain cover indefinitely.

V. PSYCHOLOGICAL PROFILE

VI. TECHNICAL CAPABILITIES & AUGMENTATION

VII. RISK / CONTROL

VIII. SELECT RELATIONSHIPS

IX. COUNCIL DYNAMICS

X. NOTES / OBSERVATIONS (RUNNING LOG)

Date Notes | Observations Initials
14/06/1988 Subject displays classic starvation logic; accepts food only under task framing. Micro-shakes at rest; compensates with deliberate motion. D.M.
08/10/1990 Post-OP-90-021. Subject reported "no complications." Bio-metrics indicated 72-hour sleep deficit and acute stress response. Successfully suppressed affect during debrief. Recommended enforced rest cycle. L.A.
17/01/1991 During Agreste integration prep. Noted meticulously repairing a child's plush. Action appears non-utilitarian. Potential sentimentality marker to be monitored. D.M.
14/08/1992 Initial reunion with assets AGRESTE, G. & E. Subject displayed transient emotional elevation exceeding baseline affective profile (increased vocal warmth, micro-expressive latency, involuntary proximity-seeking). Notably, affective spike coincided with recognition and affirmation from AGRESTE, E. Within minutes, subject self-corrected: reaction interpreted as residual attachment response rather than instability. No intervention required. T.T.
10/09/1992 Medical evaluation (routine): Neural diagnostics show 17% decline in episodic retrieval efficiency since last evaluation. Subject tolerated invasive diagnostics without complaint. Notable absence of anticipatory stress markers. However, biometric response spiked sharply upon unplanned proximity to SERDTSEV, V. (approx. +31% cortisol within 12 seconds). Subject maintained composure and did not acknowledge reaction. L.A.
—/—/— Add new entry…  

XI. ATTESTATION

Prepared By

Dominic — Director

Date

[REDACTED]

Classification

CONFIDENTIAL // EYES ONLY

AE-CONSULTATIVE ASSEMBLY // ARCHIVE NODE: [REDACTED] • DO NOT DUPLICATE • DO NOT TRANSMIT

Subject Dossier — Tsurugi, Tomoe

CONFIDENTIAL // LEVEL IV

SUBJECT DOSSIER: TSURUGI, TOMOE

FILE ID: C-AE/TT-003 • ORG: CONSULTATIVE ASSEMBLY OF EDEN • CUSTODIAN: DIR. DOMINIC

I. IDENTIFIERS

Aliases: “Tomoe”, “Tsurugi”, “Tsurugi-sama” (by staff)

Origin: Tokyo (JP) // Descendant of Nagasaki hibakusha (maternal line)

Role: Director of Technological & Cybernetic Systems; Infrastructure & Logistics Oversight; CEO of Tsurugi Industries

Competencies: Advanced cybernetics engineering, AI architecture, predictive governance modeling, multispectral sensory analysis, strategic infrastructure planning, tactical data synthesis, neural interface design, close-quarters combat (blade specialist, post-augmentation retraining).

Subject Photo — Tomoe Tsurugi
SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPH — LATEST AVAILABLE

II. EXECUTIVE SYNOPSIS

Asset is a high-value, low-volatility operative defined by a pathological drive for order and a profound rejection of human fallibility. Her utility is unparalleled in systems architecture and long-term strategic planning. Core vulnerability is a blind spot for chaotic, unpredictable human variables, which she attempts to solve with increasing layers of control. Her allegiance is to the Council's stated mission of global stability, which she interprets as the imposition of a perfect, machine-like order. A strict, samurai-derived honor code governs her actions; she requires a logical, defensible reason for all violence, making her predictable but occasionally obstructive to more expedient methods. She is a foundational pillar of the Assembly's operational infrastructure; her continued functionality is paramount. Handle with respect for her capabilities and a clear, logical rationale for all requests.

III. BACKGROUND

IV. OPERATIONAL HISTORY

Operational Codename: THE MACHINE

Mission Profile:Excels in long-term strategic system implementation, infrastructure fortification, and data hegemony. Not a primary field asset, but her systems underpin all field operations. Retains close-quarters combat proficiency for self-defense and sanctioned eliminations.

V. PSYCHOLOGICAL PROFILE

VI. TECHNICAL CAPABILITIES & AUGMENTATION

VII. RISK / CONTROL

VIII. SELECT RELATIONSHIPS

IX. COUNCIL DYNAMICS

X. NOTES / OBSERVATIONS (RUNNING LOG)

Date Notes | Observations Initials
15/09/1987 Initial assessment. Subject's intellect is formidable. Her physical deterioration presents a unique opportunity. Her philosophical framework is already fully formed: order through technology. G.S.
08/08/1990 Observed subject undergoing a significant change in aesthetics, enforced by parental pressure. Notable drop in affect and a rise in passive-aggressive compliance for 72 hours post-incident. (Note: Keep an eye on external anchors for threat escalation) C.d.S.
13/04/1991 Noted subject spending 47 minutes in ANDERS' lab post-debrief, a significant deviation from her typical efficiency. Audio logs indicate she was quietly questioning him on pre-Chernobyl Soviet computational theory. A rare display of intellectual curiosity directed at a person, not a dataset. D.M.
10/09/1992 Subject completed non-critical aesthetic modifications: changes improve external optics but offer negligible operational benefit. These changes correlate temporally with renewed parental contact and external scrutiny. Tensions significantly heightened when DE LA SANGRE challenged subject’s autonomy, highlighting non-consensual self-modification. DE LA SANGRE’s behavior suggests protective intervention impulses that are not reciprocated by subject, who defaults to justification and minimization. Tension remains unresolved but relations between assets have not been significantly changed. Suggesting continued surveillance and documentation on the potential escalation of subject's self-modification. D.M.
—/—/— Add new entry…  

XI. ATTESTATION

Prepared By

Dominic — Director

Date

[REDACTED]

Classification

CONFIDENTIAL // EYES ONLY

AE-CONSULTATIVE ASSEMBLY // ARCHIVE NODE: [REDACTED] • DO NOT DUPLICATE • DO NOT TRANSMIT

Subject Dossier — Anders, Leo

CONFIDENTIAL // LEVEL IV

SUBJECT DOSSIER: ANDERS, LEO

FILE ID: C-AE/LA-004 • ORG: CONSULTATIVE ASSEMBLY OF EDEN • CUSTODIAN: DIR. DOMINIC

I. IDENTIFIERS

Aliases: ████████████████ (historical)

Origin: Dnipropetrovsk, Ukrainian SSR (historical) // Graubünden, CH (current)

Role: Senior Research & Development Advisor (Chemical/Biological Sectors); Medical Systems Analyst

Competencies: Radiological chemistry, pharmaceutical development, toxicological analysis, biomedical systems, data synthesis & encryption.

Subject Photo — Leo Anders
SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPH — LATEST AVAILABLE

II. EXECUTIVE SYNOPSIS

Asset is a high-value, non-field operative whose utility is derived from preternatural acumen in the chemical and biological sciences. His analytical prowess, forged in the Chernobyl disaster, is directed toward pharmaceutical stabilization, counter-agent development, and mitigating physiological degradation in field personnel. The asset's operational effectiveness is contingent upon meticulous management of two primary factors: his deteriorating health, which serves as both a control mechanism and a significant liability, and his diagnosed Obsessive-Compulsive and Paranoid tendencies, which manifest as a pathological need for environmental and procedural control. It should be noted that the asset's allegiance is not to the Assembly itself, which he views with overt distaste, but to its function as a necessary instrument for global stability.

III. BACKGROUND

IV. OPERATIONAL HISTORY

Operational Codename: THE SINGULARITY

Mission Profile: R&D and medical systems oversight. Excels in laboratory research, pharmaceutical design, and long-term physiological monitoring of assets. Not a field asset.

V. PSYCHOLOGICAL PROFILE

VI. TECHNICAL CAPABILITIES & AUGMENTATION

VII. RISK / CONTROL

VIII. SELECT RELATIONSHIPS

IX. COUNCIL DYNAMICS

X. NOTES / OBSERVATIONS (RUNNING LOG)

Date Notes | Observations Initials
26/04/1986 EVENT: CHERNOBYL. Subject's psychological profile permanently altered. Note for recruitment potential: a brilliant mind shattered and seeking a new framework. D.M.
11/01/1988 Initial debrief. Subject's cooperation is purely utilitarian. He explicitly referred to the Assembly as a "regrettable necessity." His control-seeking behaviors are pronounced. D.M.
17/10/1988 During SANCŒUR, N. integration. Subject has taken a distinct paternal interest. His compulsive behaviors are notably directed toward stabilizing her. A useful control vector. D.M.
—/—/— Add new entry…  

XI. ATTESTATION

Prepared By

Dominic — Director

Director Signature

Date

[REDACTED]

Classification

CONFIDENTIAL // EYES ONLY

AE-CONSULTATIVE ASSEMBLY // ARCHIVE NODE: [REDACTED] • DO NOT DUPLICATE • DO NOT TRANSMIT

Subject Dossier — Serdtsev, Victor

CONFIDENTIAL // LEVEL IV

SUBJECT DOSSIER: SERDTSEV, VICTOR

FILE ID: C-AE/VS-005 • ORG: CONSULTATIVE ASSEMBLY OF EDEN • CUSTODIAN: DIR. DOMINIC

I. IDENTIFIERS

Aliases: “Victor”, “Serdtsev”, “Camilo Pista” (official ID), “The Tutor”, “Professor”/"Doctor" (by students) (official ID)

Origin: Obukhivka, Ukrainian SSR (historical, destroyed); Leningrad (raised); moved to Lille (FR); moved to ██████████

Role: Interrogation & Applied Persuasion Specialist; Historical & Ideological Analyst; Senior Strategic Analyst & Threat Modeler; Special Division*

Competencies:Structural kinetics & non-traceable physical interrogation, psychological profiling via Socratic method, high-pressure intelligence extraction, Soviet-era tradecraft, pedagogical instruction, strategic threat modeling.

Subject Photo — Victor Serdtsev
SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPH — LATEST AVAILABLE

II. EXECUTIVE SYNOPSIS

Asset is a high-value, high-volatility strategic resource operating within the Special Division. His value is twofold: unparalleled analytical prowess in modeling systemic failure and ideological opposition, and a peerless operational capacity for high-yield interrogation and sanctioned neutralization. The asset's psychological profile presents a unique control paradox; he exhibits residual affective markers consistent with a previously intact moral framework, yet his operational conduct is characterized by a near-total absence of empathetic response. This dissonance is his primary vulnerability. Allegiance is not to the Assembly's ideological premises, which he considers philosophically naive, but to its function as a platform that utilizes his specialized skill set. Continued compliance is predicated on intellectual engagement and the structured outlet for his methodologies. Handle via unambiguous operational parameters and logical justification. Appeals to ethical considerations are counter-productive. Monitor regularly with care.

III. BACKGROUND

IV. OPERATIONAL HISTORY

Operational Codename: THE SCYTHE

Mission Profile: Senior Strategic Analyst & Threat Modeler for the Special Division. Asset's primary function is the architecting of high-risk interrogation, neutralization, and systemic subversion protocols. His analytical products on ideological decay and resistance are considered foundational to long-term strategy. Field deployment is reserved for Tier-0 scenarios requiring his unique expertise, often serving as both strategist and field lead for the most sensitive "special cases*”.

V. PSYCHOLOGICAL PROFILE

VI. TECHNICAL CAPABILITIES & AUGMENTATION

VII. RISK / CONTROL

VIII. SELECT RELATIONSHIPS

IX. COUNCIL DYNAMICS

X. NOTES / OBSERVATIONS (RUNNING LOG)

Date Notes | Observations Initials
10/04/1988 Initial visit. ██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ Recruitment recommended.
D.M.
03/09/1988 Initial debrief. Asset's primary concern was operational parameters, not ideological alignment. A fundamentally utilitarian instrument. The persistence of this utility, despite his professed nihilism, is the central question. D.M.
23/06/1989 Monitored asset's observation of SANCŒUR during tactical drills. Physiological markers (micro-expressions, pupil dilation) indicated significant cognitive engagement, inconsistent with stated apathy. The subject-object relationship is not clean. G.S.
13/07/1989 Asset engaged with STAHLBERG in a debate on Dostoevsky. His interpretation of Crime and Punishment was a deliberate, conscious rejection of its moral conclusion, not a misunderstanding. He has architecturally constructed his nihilism as a fortress. D.M.
24/08/1990 During a routine behavioral observation of test subject #734-B (rhesus macaques monkey) in Laboratory 4, SERDTSEV entered the containment area. Contrary to standard euthanasia protocol for compromised specimens, asset did not immediately administer the terminal injection. Instead, he was observed to spend approximately 2.7 minutes simply observing the subject. He then provided a food enrichment item not part of the testing regimen. Post-interaction, asset remained stationary for 3.1 minutes, displaying a 12% decrease in standard respiratory rate and a fixed gaze on the subject. T.T.
26/12/1991 ANDERS and SERDTSEV observed in the main library following the official dissolution of the USSR. No verbal communication was recorded for the first 17 minutes. ANDERS sat with a glass of vodka, untouched. SERDTSEV stood by the window, posture rigid. At 21:43, ANDERS finally spoke (audio transcript, translated from Russian):

ANDERS: "So. It is over.”
VICTOR: "It has been over for a long time.”

The subsequent 11-minute period was characterized by a mutual and sustained cessation of communication as they drank. Biometric data was unavailable, but visual analysis indicated an absence of celebratory or relieved affect in both subjects. The interaction was instead characterized by a mutually recognized, somber acknowledgment.
C.d.S.
—/—/— Add new entry…  

XI. ATTESTATION

Prepared By

Dominic — Director

Director Signature

Date

[REDACTED]

Classification

CONFIDENTIAL // EYES ONLY

AE-CONSULTATIVE ASSEMBLY // ARCHIVE NODE: [REDACTED] • DO NOT DUPLICATE • DO NOT TRANSMIT

Subject Dossier — Stahlberg, Gisela

CONFIDENTIAL // LEVEL IV

SUBJECT DOSSIER: STAHLBERG, GISELA

FILE ID: C-AE/GS-002 • ORG: CONSULTATIVE ASSEMBLY OF EDEN • CUSTODIAN: DIR. DOMINIC

I. IDENTIFIERS

Aliases: “Die Eisenfrau”, “Stahlberg”, "The Wall", “Frau Berg”

Origin: Berlin (DK), German Democratic Republic (historical)

Role: Director of Geopolitical Strategy & Social Systems Analysis; Aegis Directive Overseer

Competencies: Geopolitical forecasting, structural systems analysis, data synthesis, multilingual interrogation (non-kinetic), Stasi-derived destabilization tactics, strategic misinformation campaigns, high-efficiency bureaucratic subversion.

Subject Photo — Gisela Stahlberg
SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPH — LATEST AVAILABLE

II. EXECUTIVE SYNOPSIS

Asset is a high-value, low-volatility operative defined by a profound, almost zealous belief in the Council as a necessary instrument for global stability. Her utility is unparalleled in the design and maintenance of large-scale social systems and the strategic application of non-kinetic pressure. The asset's psychological profile is a complex paradox: she is arguably the most emotionally perceptive member of the senior staff, possessing a deep-seated, empathetic understanding of human suffering, which she violently suppresses in favor of a meticulously constructed facade of pure objectivity. This internal conflict manifests as a relentless, self-sacrificial work ethic. She wholeheartedly believes the Council's "controlled violence" prevents greater chaos, viewing their actions as a tragic necessity she must clinically execute. Allegiance is absolute, born of ideological conviction and personal loyalty. A foundational pillar; her analytical products are considered non-redundant. Handle with professional respect. Appeals to emotion will be met with rigid, data-based rebuttals, not due to a lack of feeling, but as a defensive reflex against the moral weight of her duties.

III. BACKGROUND

IV. OPERATIONAL HISTORY

Operational Codename: THE WALL

Mission Profile: Architect of long-term geopolitical strategy and social engineering protocols. Excels in the creation and maintenance of controlled informational and demographic ecosystems. Not a field asset in the kinetic sense; her battlefield is data, policy, and public perception. Subject also maintains her high-profile public role as "Die Eisenfrau" throughout all operations, using her UN advisory position and philanthropic work as both cover and implementation vehicle for Council directives. The cognitive and physical load of maintaining this dual identity while overseeing major operations is immense, yet she shows no signs of reducing her workload.

V. PSYCHOLOGICAL PROFILE

VI. TECHNICAL CAPABILITIES & AUGMENTATION

VII. RISK / CONTROL

VIII. SELECT RELATIONSHIPS

IX. COUNCIL DYNAMICS

X. NOTES / OBSERVATIONS (RUNNING LOG)

Date Notes | Observations Initials
12/11/1987 Subject provided confirmed report of brother's death in custody. No overt emotional response. Instead, she requested access to the full Stasi file and spent 14 hours cross-referencing it with Council intelligence networks. This appears to be her mourning process - converting grief into data. D.M.
22/01/1988 Subject was instructing DE LA SANGRE on interface operation. DE LA SANGRE input several incorrect commands in sequence, resulting in a system error message. DE LA SANGRE then made a colloquial remark regarding the device's presumed parentage. STAHLBERG emitted an audible laugh (0.8 second duration, unprompted) before immediately re-engaging professional demeanor. This represents a 300% increase in positive affective expression from baseline. Notably, she did not correct the inefficiency of DE LA SANGRE's learning method. T.T.
03/12/1988 Subject and SERDTSEV engaged in heated debate about Hungarian border policy. Subject advocated for complete biometric control and mandatory ideological screening. SERDTSEV argued for manipulated permeability - allowing precisely calculated flows to create dependency and leverage: "You build a dam and call it order; I would turn their own thirst into a weapon." The argument lasted 43 minutes before subject stood abruptly: "You would solve a fever by stopping the heart." SERDTSEV responded: "And you would try to reason with a plague." First time subject has shown genuine frustration with another member. (Dialogue from verbatim transcript). D.M.
13/07/1989 Found subject asleep at her terminal for the third time this month. She had completed not only her own work but had also pre-emptively finished the quarterly reports for three other departments. When confronted, she stated, "It needed to be done. Their time was better spent on other priorities". L.A.
10/11/1989 Subject arrived at the safehouse with a split lip, bruised cheekbone, and slight limp. Uniform immaculate as always. Asset initially refused medical attention, insisting the data from the Balkan sector took priority. ANDERS had to physically block the doorway to her office to administer care. When pressed, she reported being "jumped by celebrants" near Potsdamer Platz who recognized her East Berlin accent. "They called me a Stasi whore for trying to go home". (Dialogue from verbatim transcript). C.d.S.
03/02/1990 Overheard subject on secure line with a West German official. Tone was perfectly professional, even as she referenced demographic data from the district where she was assaulted. No indication of personal connection. After disconnecting, she sat perfectly still for 1.2 minutes, hands flat on the desk. Then resumed work. D.M.
06/11/1991 Subject ANDERS characterized STAHLBERG's threat assessment model as "computationally elegant but affectively sterile," stating it failed to account for "human variables" (verbatim). STAHLBERG offered no verbal rebuttal, maintaining professional detachment. However, biometric monitoring via her terminal's touchpad registered a 22% increase in micro-tremors and a sustained galvanic skin response spike for 4 minutes post-comment. The data suggests the critique was registered as a significant interpersonal stimulus, despite the subject's external presentation of indifference. T.T.
—/—/— Add new entry…  

XI. ATTESTATION

Prepared By

Dominic — Director

Director Signature

Date

[REDACTED]

Classification

CONFIDENTIAL // EYES ONLY

AE-CONSULTATIVE ASSEMBLY // ARCHIVE NODE: [REDACTED] • DO NOT DUPLICATE • DO NOT TRANSMIT

Subject Dossier — de la Sangre, Catalina

CONFIDENTIAL // LEVEL IV

SUBJECT DOSSIER: DE LA SANGRE, CATALINA

FILE ID: C-AE/CDS-001 • ORG: CONSULTATIVE ASSEMBLY OF EDEN • CUSTODIAN: DIR. DOMINIC

I. IDENTIFIERS

Aliases: “Catalina”, “de la Sangre”, “Abuelita”/"Welita" (by junior assets), ”La Espada Que Danza”/“La Muerte Florecida” (field legends)

Origin: Dolores Hidalgo, GTO (MX); moved to ████████████, QRO (MX)

Role: Field Operations Director; Senior Tactical Instructor; Psychological Stabilization & Morale Officer; Designated Successor (non-active; senior consensus confirmed; activation contingent on volatility mitigation).

Competencies: Asymmetric & guerrilla warfare doctrine, close-quarters combat (blade specialist), tactical improvisation & real-time contingency management, advanced psychological profiling & behavioral shaping, high-risk infiltration & exfiltration, multilingual interrogation (kinetic & non-kinetic), talent acquisition & developmental mentorship, organizational loyalty cultivation & management, cross-cultural symbolic communication.

Subject Photo — Catalina de la Sangre
SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPH — LATEST AVAILABLE

II. EXECUTIVE SYNOPSIS

DE LA SANGRE is the Assembly's most versatile operative. She uniquely combines peerless field efficacy with an extraordinary capacity to understand and stabilize other agent, eliminating threats to the Assembly's operational integrity with a speed and finality that borders on the preternatural. Her value is not merely functional but deeply relational - she maintains the social cohesion of the senior staff and serves as a trusted mentor to junior assets. Her loyalty to the Director and team is personal and absolute. Despite being one of the Assembly's founders, she formally declined the title of co-director, opting for a role with greater operational freedom and direct asset contact. Still, successor designation has effectively been ratified by senior consensus, including SERDTSEV, though activation is deferred due to volatility risk.

III. BACKGROUND

IV. OPERATIONAL HISTORY

Operational Codename: THE BLADE

Mission Profile: Excels in high-risk field operations, leadership decapitation, and total network dismantlement. Serves as primary field lead for Tier-0* scenarios deemed "unsalvageable". Functions as the primary mentor and tactical instructor for all field-capable assets as well as the final, unappealable arbiter of field competency.

V. PSYCHOLOGICAL PROFILE

VI. TECHNICAL CAPABILITIES & AUGMENTATION

VII. RISK / CONTROL

VIII. SELECT RELATIONSHIPS

IX. COUNCIL DYNAMICS

X. NOTES / OBSERVATIONS (RUNNING LOG)

Date Notes | Observations Initials
17/06/1987 Following success of OP-87-041 (Moldova), subject initiated an impromptu celebration with both senior and junior assets. DE LA SANGRE consumed a significant volume of low-quality mezcal, maintaining high affect and social cohesion for 2.5 hours. Post-event, she was discovered by TSURUGI experiencing emesis, verbally berating the alcohol bottle for its "treachery" and failure to incapacitate her, accompanied with a significant volume of colloquialisms and pejorative terminology - the specific content of which is not suitable for this document. The gathering significantly improved inter-asset cohesion. However, subject's capacity for alcohol is noted as exceptionally high, and her reaction to overconsumption is not incapacitation but belligerence towards inanimate objects. Future non-operational social functions should be pre-emptively stocked with quality-controlled consumables to prevent both property damage and the degradation of a formidable operative's dignity. G.S.
15/12/1988 Subject was overseeing a live-fire exercise with SERDTSEV. During a lull, they were observed sitting on an ammunition crate. SERDTSEV was sketching in a small notebook. Subject was speaking quietly, gesturing to the sketch. Audio picked up her saying, "...so the fool sees the tragedy, but the martyr feels the farce... And you, Victor, always miss the joke". SERDTSEV did not reply but offered a nod. Subject's biometrics showed a 15% decrease in baseline cortisol and a relaxed posture atypical for a training environment and proximity around SERDTSEV. T.T.
21/05/1989 Located subject in the central gardens at 03:13 during a non-operational period. She was stationary, observed staring at the poppies woven into her hair. When approached, she immediately re-engaged her characteristic vibrant demeanor to discuss operational timelines, but the transition, while seamless, featured a 1.2-second latency in response initiation. V.S.
24/11/1989 Subject took a potentially fatal blow meant for SANCŒUR during a live-fire exercise. The sim-round left a severe bruise over her kidney. She shrugged it off, winked at SANCŒUR, and said, "You owe me a drink, niña" (verbatim). Later, she was seen leaning heavily against a wall, showing suppressed signs of distress and pain. Was taken immediately to medical. N.S.
11/01/1990 During a routine security review, subject's quarters were found to contain what appears to be a personal memorial wall. Contains photographs of 73 individuals - some targets, some victims, some collateral. Each photo is connected by string to documents, newspaper clippings, and in some cases, personal effects. The wall displays a level of personal attachment to operational outcomes that borders on pathological. Of note, she became internally agitated (increased respiratory rate, minor tremor in hands) when she could not immediately recall the surname of a factory worker from a failed 1986 extraction in Gdansk. L.A.
04/05/1990 Subject engaged in a spontaneous, 2-hour close-combat training session with SANCŒUR, in Gymnasium B. Session escalated beyond standard sparring protocols. Final 12 minutes involved full-force, non-pulled strikes and complex joint manipulation. Both agents concluded the session with visible injuries. Noted that SANCŒUR did not once attempt to disengage or call for halt. DE LA SANGRE was smiling throughout. D.M.
26/06/1991 Subject was conducting a final briefing for OP-91-102 (Strasbourg) with SERDTSEV. Her demeanor was professional but warm, using tactical slang to ease team tension. However, when Jr. Analyst RIGAULT (see: TERMINATED) challenged SERDTSEV's projected 12% collateral casualty estimate as "excessively conservative," the subject's affect shifted instantaneously. In 1.4 seconds, she closed the distance to RIGAULT and, with a precise structural kinetic adjustment, terminated the asset cleanly, minimizing suffering and spillage - postmortem confirmed atlanto-occipital dislocation resulting in immediate respiratory arrest.

To the team (audio transcript): "The 'butcher's bill' is calculated by me. His numbers are my scripture. Question his math again, and I will personally demonstrate the variables."

The subject's biomarkers showed no elevation. She later filed a report designating RIGAULT as a compromised mole. A Level-4 forensic sweep, initiated on her recommendation, uncovered an active dead-drop protocol in RIGAULT's quarters, confirming unauthorized external communication.
G.S.
03/09/1991 Subject has initiated an intensive, unsanctioned training regimen with SANCŒUR. Sessions are characterized by extreme physical and psychological duress: 18-hour endurance drills, sensory deprivation lock-picking, and live-blade sparring where subject demonstrates lethal intent. T.T.
18/01/1992 ██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
D.M.
10/09/1992 During cohesion gathering, DE LA SANGRE visually/auditorily assessed TSURUGI upon entry; subject’s affect shifted from high warmth to neutral threat-focus within the second. Subject issued direct command (“Look at me”), questioned TSURUGI regarding recent cosmetic modifications, and initiated escalation sequence. Secondary staff exhibited immediate risk-mitigation behaviors. Subject self-interrupted escalation, withdrew, reassembled humor, and exited briefly under pretext of retrieving supplies. Upon return, subject resumed cohesion facilitation. Assessment: DE LA SANGRE demonstrates capacity to “fold” high-intensity anger into controlled affect presentation when aware of collateral destabilization. However, others should aim to avoid such events completely as collective safety may become compromised in such instances. D.M.
—/—/— Add new entry…  

XI. ATTESTATION

Prepared By

Dominic — Director

Date

[REDACTED]

Classification

CONFIDENTIAL // EYES ONLY

AE-CONSULTATIVE ASSEMBLY // ARCHIVE NODE: [REDACTED] • DO NOT DUPLICATE • DO NOT TRANSMIT

Personal Notes — Malraux, Dominic

PERSONAL NOTES - UNSANCTIONED

SUBJECT: MALRAUX, DOMINIC

AUTHOR: ██████████████████████

I. Identifiers

Aliases: "Director," "Father," "The Gardener," "Archbishop", "Dominic"

Origin: Naples, Italy (1952)

"Head Gardener" might be more accurate

Role: Architect and Director

Competencies: Spiritual manipulation, systemic corruption, psychological profiling, organizational architecture

Subject Photo — Dominic Malraux
SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPH — LATEST AVAILABLE

Captured shortly before restructuring council initiative; He monitored our personnel fatigue levels

II. Executive Assessment

Malraux represents the most dangerous kind of revolutionary: one who acts from genuine compassion rather than ambition. His operational thesis - that the world cannot be reformed, only rebuilt - stems from personal experience with institutional failure at the most intimate level. The Council serves as both his laboratory and his evidence; we are living proof that "broken" individuals can be repurposed for higher efficiency when given proper direction and purpose. The terrifying aspect isn't his methodology, but his sincerity - he genuinely believes this is the only way to prevent others from experiencing the suffering that shaped him. Every decision, no matter how cruel, is framed as a necessary step toward creating a world where no child is abandoned, no faith is betrayed, no mother is murdered for wanting to escape.

III. Background Notes

  • Product of Catholic orphanage system - learned early that institutions serve their own survival above all else

Early acquisition of information-for-absolution dynamic

  • Documented sexual assault by clergy member at age 12, followed by institutional cover-up and victim-blaming where he was forced to confess to "tempting" his abuser

  • Excelled academically within the Church structure while developing deep antipathy for its core beliefs - graduated top of his class at the Pontifical Gregorian University

  • Rose through Vatican hierarchy as an exercise in systems penetration rather than spiritual devotion - became the youngest archbishop of his generation

Thesis was on "Institutional Failure as Theological Necessity”

  • Personal tragedy: located biological mother in 1974, attempted reconciliation rejected. Her subsequent murder by domestic violence and the Church's refusal to provide burial rites served as the catalytic event cementing his worldview

  • Discovery of Miraculous legends during theological research provided both methodology and justification for his ambitions - he sees them as tools that previous "gods" failed to wield properly

He doesn't just want to be a god - he wants to be better

IV. Operational Profile

Field Name: THE SCEPTER

Governance instrument rather than blunt force

 

Methodology: Long-term cultivation of human assets through psychological profiling and manipulation. Specializes in identifying exceptional individuals at critical junctures where personal trauma intersects with systemic betrayal - what he calls "the moment of perfect fracture."

Some of us should have run when he found us.

Current Missions:

  • Consultative Assembly of Eden: Ongoing project in creating functional organizational family from high-risk individuals. Success measured in operational efficiency and interpersonal bonding

    Charts our "bonding metrics" alongside our mission success rates. Believes he's found correlation.

 

  • Global Systems Analysis: Continuous assessment of failing institutions (political, religious, economic) to identify optimal pressure points for eventual collapse

     

  • Theological/Historical Research: Maintaining Vatican position while pursuing knowledge of anomalous power structures (Miraculous) - views them as tools for the eventual restructuring

V. Psychological Assessment

Core objective: prevent recurrence of childhood and clerical institutional harms

Primary Motivation: Creation of a world immune to the specific institutional failures that characterized his personal history. This is not power for its own sake, but about proving through practical demonstration that systemic suffering can be eliminated through controlled demolition and rebuilding.

 

Notable Characteristics:

  • Maintains preternatural calm in crisis - reads as spiritual serenity but is actually clinical detachment

  • Demonstrates deep understanding of individual psychological needs - uses this knowledge for both support and control

  • Uses affection and belonging as primary control mechanisms - makes compliance feel like family loyalty

  • Genuinely distressed by observable suffering among Council members - sees it as personal failure and evidence of current system's irredeemability

Vulnerabilities:

  • Over-investment in Council as proof of concept - cannot accept failure of the experiment

 

  • Apparent emotional dependency on certain key relationships - contradicts his professed detachment

Consistently positions himself to monitor ingress/egress points

  • Inability to accept incremental improvement when total transformation seems possible - shows impatience with "half-measures"

VI. Capabilities Assessment

  • Genius-level strategic planner with exceptional long-range vision

  • Master of multiple philosophical and theological systems - uses their language while subverting their purposes

  • Fluent in using institutional language to mask radical intent - appears orthodox while planning revolution

  • Exceptional talent for identifying and developing human potential - sees brokenness as raw material

VII. Risk Analysis

Threat Level: Maximum. Not due to volatility or impulsivity, but because of absolute conviction combined with strategic patience and the unwavering loyalty he commands.

He's getting impatient. The man who waited decades is now tapping his watch.

Controls:

  • The Council's welfare serves as his primary constraint - our suffering accelerates his timeline

  • His own intellectual commitment to structured process - may provide warning signs before action

Limitations increasingly viewed as obstacles rather than boundaries

  • The practical limitations of any single actor, no matter how brilliant - though he is testing this boundary

 

Analytical note: We are his controls. And he is straining at the leash. Every time one of us stumbles, the leash tightens.

VIII. Relationships

With both parents deceased and his disdain for the Church that raised him, he views the Council as both family and experimental subjects. His investment in our well-being is genuine but instrumental to his larger goals - he cares for us as both people and proof of concept.

It's an interesting relationship...

DE LA SANGRE, C.: Unique status as peer rather than subordinate. Their relationship appears to be the only one that challenges his operational assumptions but he struggles to express his feelings outside of practical terms - it terrifies him because it is the one thing in his life he did not engineer. She's his favorite weapon and his only friend, and he cannot reconcile these two roles.

 

STAHLBERG, G: Does not fully agree with her doctrine but realizes she is valuable as the foundation of the Council. As his first senior recruit, he finds her self-destruction quite tragic, and after multiple failures to restrain her punishing workload, is noticeably hurrying his plan, hoping to beat her ticking clock. Her exhaustion is his failure.

Started doing the paperwork at night

SERDTSEV, V: His favorite experiment and most curious case study. He obsesses over the question: why does a man who supposedly does not care about anything work for his Council? Whether Malraux knows of the hubris that possesses him in trying to study SERDTSEV, I do not know. Their debates are the closest he comes to intellectual pleasure.

ANDERS, L: Malraux holds respect for ANDERS but the two have accepted their mutual roles as tools for the other. Still, I suspect he would rather not have to replace ANDERS despite having multiple alternatives that are more practical. There's a certain comfort in their mutual understanding of being damaged goods.

TSURUGI, T: The perfect asset who took the path of transcendence he once considered. He respects her technical skill, but pities the humanity she shed. He also pities the amount of control she lets her parents have in her life - it mirrors his own history with the Church.

 

SANCŒUR, N.: The sacrificial lamb and the perfect daughter. The one who most perfectly embodies his philosophy of love-through-self-erasure. It both fascinates and horrifies him - she is the living embodiment of his ideals, and he watches her destroy herself to fulfill them.

He gave the plush cat back… an unknown variable

The other members find him unsettling precisely because of this contradiction: a man capable of deep compassion who also engineers catastrophe. His empathy makes them uneasy because it suggests choice - and choice implies intentional cruelty. We could forgive a monster. A loving god who permits suffering is much harder to accept.

IX. Behavioral Observations

25/12/1991: Found Subject in his private quarters, holding a faded rosary and a death certificate. He was not praying. He was staring at them with an expression of profound, world-ending grief. This is the well he draws from.

16/01/1992: Malraux observed taking notes on Charles Manson. Autobiography was filled with tabs, notes, and marks - he has clearly been doing this secretly for a while now. Not admiration, but study of manipulation techniques and organizational dynamics.

"Even failed experiments yield data" - overheard.

21/01/1992: Malraux observed Council social gathering. Demonstrated unusual stillness while monitoring interactions. Expression suggested memorializing rather than participating. As if already planning the next iteration, or saying goodbye to this one.

Found a discarded list of our names — "Anchor," "Foundation," "Scalpel," "Heart," "Mirror," "Sacrifice."

03/03/1992: Intercepted a memo he'd discarded. Had drawn a timeline with "Catalyst Events" marked. Our names were there next to dates. He's measuring our breaking points.

X. Projected Trajectory

Are any of us really willing?

Malraux is approaching a strategic inflection point. His tolerance for the world's imperfections appears to be reaching its limit. His plans are showing signs of strategic shift from management to active dismantlement of global systems. This appears directly correlated with observed stress levels among Council members. The suffering of his "family" within the current system is becoming the catalyst that moves him from theory to practice. He has the methodology (Miraculous research), the resources (Council and Vatican positions), and the willing instruments (us).

 

The only remaining question is whether anyone can offer an alternative that satisfies both his intellectual framework and his emotional investments before he decides the only solution is to burn everything down and start over.

God have mercy on our souls. Dominic certainly won't.

PERSONAL NOTES - DO NOT CIRCULATE - EYES ONLY - DESTROY AFTER READING